Monday, April 25, 2016 by D. Samuelson
I do not understand the rabid millennial female support for Mrs. Clinton. But then again, these young women weren’t of age when the foundations of the nuclear family were being dismantled. The Rockefeller funded idea of a “strong, independent, bring home the bacon, own your body and have it all” fantasy was socially engineered into the American consciousness decades ago. So for Hillary to lie through her teeth continually is not a problem, because, after all, she’s a woman and a woman president would be a lovely thing, so they say. But a lying, murdering, conniving, manipulating, lawless president – whether male or female or LBQT – is something we’ve already dealt with, yes?
Mrs. Clinton prattles on and on about how she’s in support of families and children, life and the middle class and how she is different from Bernie Sanders, especially in the arena of making gun manufacturers liable, as reported by lawnewz.com
“Calling the issue ‘one of my biggest contrasts with Senator Sanders,’ [Clinton] railed against his position saying that gun manufacturers should not be held liable for mass shootings like Sandy Hook. Clinton said it is ‘unimaginable’ that Sanders can place the rights of gun makers over the parents of children killed in a school attack.
“In the Daily News interview, Sanders said that the victim of a gun crime should generally not be able to sue the manufacturer, but that ‘gun manufacturers and gun dealers should be able to be sued when they should know that guns are going into the hands of wrong people.'”
If Hillary cared about the well-being of children and families, she would know about the dangers of vaccines and conventional medicine. And her fund raising sources would reflect it. Does it? From Twisted News:
“…Her campaign is fraught with strategists and fundraisers who have deep ties to Big Health and Big Pharma.
As reported by The Hill in September, Clinton topped the list of donations from Big Pharma, receiving more cash from the industry than any other candidate of either major political party. At the time, she had ‘accepted $164,315 in the first six months of the campaign from drug companies,’ the site reported.”
But it’s deeper than that. Paul Craig Roberts reports:
“The Clintons’ purchase by interest groups is public knowledge. For example, CNN reports that between February 2001 and May 2015 Bill and Hillary Clinton were paid $153 million in speaking fees for 729 speeches, an average price of $210,000.
“According to the International Business Times, ‘Under Hillary Clinton, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments had given millions to the Clinton Foundation.’
“She pushed the Obama regime into the destruction of a stable and largely cooperative government in Libya where the ‘Arab Spring’ was a CIA-backed group of jihadists who were used to dislodge China from its oil investments in eastern Libya. She urged her husband to bomb Yugoslavia. She pushed for ‘regime change’ in Syria. She oversaw the coup that overthrew the democratically elected president of Honduras. She brought neoconservative Victoria Nuland, who arranged the coup that overthrew the democratically elected president of Ukraine, into the State Department. Hillary has called President Vladimir Putin of Russia the ‘new Hitler.’ Hillary as president guarantees war and more war.”
So for Hillary to make up some bogus charge about Bernie Sanders putting the rights of gun manufacturers before children is ridiculous. She also supports GMOs and not clean food. Mrs. Clinton puts money and power for herself above everyone and everything. Her Presidency is terrifying for another reason; “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.”